Hero
Computer Vision & Imaging AI
Video Analytics & Object Tracking
Medical Imaging & Diagnostics

AI-Assisted Mammography Detection Rollout for a Women's Imaging Network


Let's Connect

Overview

What we built

A women's imaging network of 16 centres could not keep up with 3D mammography screening, and every week the unread backlog grew. We added a prioritised AI reading workflow that puts the exams that need attention first.

In plain terms: each 3D mammography exam produces far more images than an older 2D study, and every one of those images had to be read by a radiologist working through a strict first-in, first-out queue. With a radiologist shortage pressing on all 16 centres, the unread backlog stretched past three weeks, which meant patients waited longer for results letters and any follow-up scheduling that depended on them, no matter how urgent their own case actually was.

We integrated a regulator-cleared AI detection engine into the network's existing reading workflow, so every exam gets a suspicion score that pushes likely-abnormal cases to the front of a prioritised worklist. Finding overlays render inside the same viewer radiologists already use, with sign-off still required from a radiologist on every case. Screening report turnaround fell from 11 days to 4, average reading time per exam dropped by 24%, the backlog cleared within 9 weeks of full rollout, and the recall rate held within 0.4 percentage points of baseline.

The Problem

Growing 3D screening backlog

Across the network's 16 centres, 3D mammography had become the standard screening exam, and each one produces hundreds of image slices for a radiologist to review, far more than an older 2D study. Reading times ran well above what 2D screening required, and a radiologist shortage meant fewer people were available to absorb that extra volume.

Every exam was read strictly in the order it arrived, with no way to tell a likely-abnormal case from a routine one before a radiologist opened it. That queue discipline was fair in principle, but it meant a genuinely concerning case could sit behind routine exams for exactly as long as everything else.

The unread backlog pushed past three weeks, and every exam waiting in it delayed two things at once: the results letter a patient was waiting for, and any follow-up scheduling that depended on that letter going out. The longer the queue grew, the further behind those two things fell.

Higher-volume 3D exams

Each 3D mammography exam produces hundreds of image slices, well beyond what an older 2D study required, adding real reading time across all 16 centres.

Radiologist shortage

A radiologist shortage across the network meant fewer people were available to absorb the extra reading volume that 3D screening required.

Strict arrival-order reading

Every case was read strictly in the order it arrived, with no way to identify a likely-abnormal exam ahead of a routine one.

Growing unread backlog

The unread exam backlog pushed past three weeks, delaying results letters and any follow-up scheduling that depended on a case being read.

What it was costing them

Every week the backlog grew past three weeks was a week of delayed results letters and stalled follow-up scheduling, for urgent and routine cases alike. Reading strictly in arrival order meant a concerning exam got no priority over a routine one, so the shortage of radiologists across all 16 centres was setting the pace for how quickly any patient, regardless of need, found out what her scan showed.

The Solution

AI-prioritised reading workflow

We integrated a regulator-cleared AI detection engine directly into the network's existing reading workflow rather than adding a separate system. Every 3D exam now receives a case-level suspicion score as it comes in, and that score feeds a prioritised worklist so likely-abnormal exams surface ahead of routine ones instead of waiting their turn in arrival order.

Finding overlays render inside the same viewer radiologists already use, so the AI output sits alongside the images rather than in a separate application. Every AI-assisted case still requires a radiologist's sign-off before a result goes out, keeping the reading decision with the radiologist and the software in a supporting role.

A network-wide dashboard tracks turnaround, recall rates and reading volumes across all 16 centres, giving the network one view of how the backlog is moving and whether prioritisation is working the way it was meant to.

Key decisions

01

Prioritise by suspicion, not arrival

We replaced strict arrival-order reading with a worklist ranked by case-level suspicion score, so likely-abnormal exams surface first instead of waiting behind routine ones.

02

Render overlays in the existing viewer

Finding overlays appear inside the viewer radiologists already use, so adopting the AI engine required no new application or separate login.

03

Keep sign-off with the radiologist

Every AI-assisted case still requires a radiologist's sign-off, so the engine informs the reading order and the findings without replacing clinical judgement.

04

One dashboard for the network

A network-wide dashboard tracks turnaround, recall rates and reading volumes across all 16 centres, so the rollout could be measured centre by centre rather than assumed.

05

Target the arrival-order backlog directly

We aimed the rollout squarely at the three-week backlog, prioritising the exams most likely to need urgent attention first.

Measurable Impact

What changed after launch

The backlog stopped growing and then cleared. Screening report turnaround fell from 11 days to 4 across the network, and average radiologist reading time per 3D exam dropped by 24% as the worklist put attention where it mattered most. The three-week unread backlog cleared within 9 weeks of full rollout.

None of that came at the expense of accuracy: the recall rate held within 0.4 percentage points of baseline under quarterly audit, so faster turnaround did not mean a looser standard. Patients across all 16 centres now wait days rather than weeks for results and any follow-up scheduling that depends on them.

Report turnaround

11 days across the network

Down to 4 days

Reading time

Well above 2D screening exam times

Cut by 24% per 3D exam

Unread backlog

Past three weeks and growing

Cleared within 9 weeks of rollout

Recall rate

Baseline under the prior workflow

Held within 0.4 points under audit

Headline results

Screening report turnaround reduced from 11 days to 4 across the network

Average radiologist reading time per 3D screening exam cut by 24%

Three-week unread exam backlog cleared within 9 weeks of full rollout

Recall rate held within 0.4 percentage points of baseline under quarterly audit

Tech & Tools Used

What powered the build

Every tool below earned its place in this engagement. Here is the part each one played.

Python (FastAPI) logo

Python (FastAPI)

Serves as the integration layer between the imaging viewer and the detection engine, handling scoring requests and returning suspicion scores to the worklist.

ONNX Runtime logo

ONNX Runtime

Executes the exported detection model in production, keeping scoring fast enough that a suspicion score is ready before a radiologist opens the exam.

Orthanc (DICOM)

Acts as the DICOM store receiving 3D mammography exams from each centre and handing them to the scoring pipeline.

DICOMweb

Lets the viewer and detection engine exchange images and overlay data through a shared web-based DICOM interface across all 16 centres.

RabbitMQ logo

RabbitMQ

Queues incoming exams for scoring so the pipeline works through a steady stream of studies without a backlog forming behind the AI step itself.

PostgreSQL logo

PostgreSQL

Stores suspicion scores, worklist positions and sign-off records, giving each exam a traceable path from arrival to radiologist decision.

React logo

React

Powers the prioritised worklist and the network-wide dashboard, both delivered in the browser to radiologists and network leadership.

Docker logo

Docker

Packages the detection service and its dependencies into consistent containers, so every centre in the network runs the same stack.

Azure Blob Storage

Holds the exam image archive and overlay artefacts, scaling with the volume of image slices that 3D screening produces across the network.

Grafana logo

Grafana

Renders the network-wide dashboard tracking turnaround, recall rates and reading volumes across all 16 centres.

Ready to Build your Medical Imaging & Diagnostics Business with Video Analytics & Object Tracking

Ask Byte

Ask Byte

Typically replies instantly

just Now

Hi! I'm OrganByte's assistant. How can I help you today?

AI-generated content may be incorrect


OrganByte

Building innovative software solutions that transform businesses and drive digital success.

© 2026 YourCompany. All rights reserved.