
AI-Assisted Mammography Detection Rollout for a Women's Imaging Network
Let's Connect
Overview
What we built
A women's imaging network of 16 centres could not keep up with 3D mammography screening, and every week the unread backlog grew. We added a prioritised AI reading workflow that puts the exams that need attention first.
In plain terms: each 3D mammography exam produces far more images than an older 2D study, and every one of those images had to be read by a radiologist working through a strict first-in, first-out queue. With a radiologist shortage pressing on all 16 centres, the unread backlog stretched past three weeks, which meant patients waited longer for results letters and any follow-up scheduling that depended on them, no matter how urgent their own case actually was.
We integrated a regulator-cleared AI detection engine into the network's existing reading workflow, so every exam gets a suspicion score that pushes likely-abnormal cases to the front of a prioritised worklist. Finding overlays render inside the same viewer radiologists already use, with sign-off still required from a radiologist on every case. Screening report turnaround fell from 11 days to 4, average reading time per exam dropped by 24%, the backlog cleared within 9 weeks of full rollout, and the recall rate held within 0.4 percentage points of baseline.
The Problem
Growing 3D screening backlog
Across the network's 16 centres, 3D mammography had become the standard screening exam, and each one produces hundreds of image slices for a radiologist to review, far more than an older 2D study. Reading times ran well above what 2D screening required, and a radiologist shortage meant fewer people were available to absorb that extra volume.
Every exam was read strictly in the order it arrived, with no way to tell a likely-abnormal case from a routine one before a radiologist opened it. That queue discipline was fair in principle, but it meant a genuinely concerning case could sit behind routine exams for exactly as long as everything else.
The unread backlog pushed past three weeks, and every exam waiting in it delayed two things at once: the results letter a patient was waiting for, and any follow-up scheduling that depended on that letter going out. The longer the queue grew, the further behind those two things fell.
Higher-volume 3D exams
Each 3D mammography exam produces hundreds of image slices, well beyond what an older 2D study required, adding real reading time across all 16 centres.
Radiologist shortage
A radiologist shortage across the network meant fewer people were available to absorb the extra reading volume that 3D screening required.
Strict arrival-order reading
Every case was read strictly in the order it arrived, with no way to identify a likely-abnormal exam ahead of a routine one.
Growing unread backlog
The unread exam backlog pushed past three weeks, delaying results letters and any follow-up scheduling that depended on a case being read.
What it was costing them
Every week the backlog grew past three weeks was a week of delayed results letters and stalled follow-up scheduling, for urgent and routine cases alike. Reading strictly in arrival order meant a concerning exam got no priority over a routine one, so the shortage of radiologists across all 16 centres was setting the pace for how quickly any patient, regardless of need, found out what her scan showed.
The Solution
AI-prioritised reading workflow
We integrated a regulator-cleared AI detection engine directly into the network's existing reading workflow rather than adding a separate system. Every 3D exam now receives a case-level suspicion score as it comes in, and that score feeds a prioritised worklist so likely-abnormal exams surface ahead of routine ones instead of waiting their turn in arrival order.
Finding overlays render inside the same viewer radiologists already use, so the AI output sits alongside the images rather than in a separate application. Every AI-assisted case still requires a radiologist's sign-off before a result goes out, keeping the reading decision with the radiologist and the software in a supporting role.
A network-wide dashboard tracks turnaround, recall rates and reading volumes across all 16 centres, giving the network one view of how the backlog is moving and whether prioritisation is working the way it was meant to.
Key decisions
Prioritise by suspicion, not arrival
We replaced strict arrival-order reading with a worklist ranked by case-level suspicion score, so likely-abnormal exams surface first instead of waiting behind routine ones.
Render overlays in the existing viewer
Finding overlays appear inside the viewer radiologists already use, so adopting the AI engine required no new application or separate login.
Keep sign-off with the radiologist
Every AI-assisted case still requires a radiologist's sign-off, so the engine informs the reading order and the findings without replacing clinical judgement.
One dashboard for the network
A network-wide dashboard tracks turnaround, recall rates and reading volumes across all 16 centres, so the rollout could be measured centre by centre rather than assumed.
Target the arrival-order backlog directly
We aimed the rollout squarely at the three-week backlog, prioritising the exams most likely to need urgent attention first.
Measurable Impact
What changed after launch
The backlog stopped growing and then cleared. Screening report turnaround fell from 11 days to 4 across the network, and average radiologist reading time per 3D exam dropped by 24% as the worklist put attention where it mattered most. The three-week unread backlog cleared within 9 weeks of full rollout.
None of that came at the expense of accuracy: the recall rate held within 0.4 percentage points of baseline under quarterly audit, so faster turnaround did not mean a looser standard. Patients across all 16 centres now wait days rather than weeks for results and any follow-up scheduling that depends on them.
Report turnaround
11 days across the network
Down to 4 days
Reading time
Well above 2D screening exam times
Cut by 24% per 3D exam
Unread backlog
Past three weeks and growing
Cleared within 9 weeks of rollout
Recall rate
Baseline under the prior workflow
Held within 0.4 points under audit
Headline results
Screening report turnaround reduced from 11 days to 4 across the network
Average radiologist reading time per 3D screening exam cut by 24%
Three-week unread exam backlog cleared within 9 weeks of full rollout
Recall rate held within 0.4 percentage points of baseline under quarterly audit
Tech & Tools Used
What powered the build
Every tool below earned its place in this engagement. Here is the part each one played.
Python (FastAPI)
Serves as the integration layer between the imaging viewer and the detection engine, handling scoring requests and returning suspicion scores to the worklist.
ONNX Runtime
Executes the exported detection model in production, keeping scoring fast enough that a suspicion score is ready before a radiologist opens the exam.
Orthanc (DICOM)
Acts as the DICOM store receiving 3D mammography exams from each centre and handing them to the scoring pipeline.
DICOMweb
Lets the viewer and detection engine exchange images and overlay data through a shared web-based DICOM interface across all 16 centres.
RabbitMQ
Queues incoming exams for scoring so the pipeline works through a steady stream of studies without a backlog forming behind the AI step itself.
PostgreSQL
Stores suspicion scores, worklist positions and sign-off records, giving each exam a traceable path from arrival to radiologist decision.
React
Powers the prioritised worklist and the network-wide dashboard, both delivered in the browser to radiologists and network leadership.
Docker
Packages the detection service and its dependencies into consistent containers, so every centre in the network runs the same stack.
Azure Blob Storage
Holds the exam image archive and overlay artefacts, scaling with the volume of image slices that 3D screening produces across the network.
Grafana
Renders the network-wide dashboard tracking turnaround, recall rates and reading volumes across all 16 centres.
Ready to Build your Medical Imaging & Diagnostics Business with Video Analytics & Object Tracking
Ask Byte
Ask Byte
Typically replies instantly
just Now
Hi! I'm OrganByte's assistant. How can I help you today?
AI-generated content may be incorrect

